Perodua Traz vs Proton X50 vs Chery Tiggo Cross: Who wins the compact SUV faceoff?
Perodua has been leading the sales charts in the local automotive industry for a long time, with 5 out of 10 best-selling cars in Malaysia belonging to P2 (Bezza, Axia, Myvi, Alza and Ativa). Now, it seems to get one more spot with its newly launched compact SUV, the Traz.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
How much does the Perodua Traz cost?
The Perodua Traz price ranges between RM 76,100 and RM 82,000 (on the road, without insurance).What are the rivals of the Perodua Traz?
The Proton X50 and the Chery Tiggo Cross are among the key rivals of the Perodua Traz.What is the fuel efficiency of the Perodua Traz?
The Perodua Traz offers a fuel efficiency of 21.3 kmpl (on the Malaysia Driving Cycle Mode).Perodua launched the Traz last month as its most user-friendly vehicle to date, and is ready to capture a bigger chunk of the compact SUV segment. Described as a practical, city-friendly SUV with “proper car” space (not a gadget flex), the SUV is clearly benchmarked against two familiar names in the category - Model X and Model T, representing the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross.
In today’s story, we will be comparing the Perodua Traz with the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross, giving prospective buyers a gist of how it really stacks up against the competition.

Variants and price
Perodua offers the Traz in two variants - X and H, priced at RM 76,100 and RM 82,000 (on the road without insurance), respectively. Here’s how its price compares against the rivals -
|
Models |
Perodua Traz |
Proton X50 |
Chery Tiggo Cross |
|
Variants |
Two - X and H |
Three - Executive, Premium, and Flagship |
Two - Turbo and Hybrid CSH |
|
Price |
RM 76,100 to RM 82,000 |
RM 89,800 to RM 113,300 |
RM 88,800 to RM 99,800 |
As we can see, the Traz is most competitively priced in the bunch, with a starting price of RM 76,100, targeting first-time and budget-conscious buyers.
The Proton X50 has established itself as the best-selling B-segment SUV for five consecutive years, thanks to its appealing design and feature-rich cabin that offers a strong value-for-money proposition. While being slightly more premium than the Traz, the X50’s base model is priced close to it, prompting buyers to compare the two while choosing the right SUV.
The Chery Tiggo Cross is also a compelling choice in the segment that brings stylish design, smart features and hybrid tech to the table at a tempting price point, appealing to younger drivers and urban families.
Dimensions

|
Specs |
Perodua Traz |
Proton X50 |
Chery Tiggo Cross |
|
Length |
4,310 mm |
4,380 mm |
4318 mm |
|
Width |
1,770 mm |
1,795 mm |
1830 mm |
|
Height |
1,655 mm |
1,609 mm |
1670 mm |
|
Wheelbase |
2,620 mm |
2,600 mm |
2610 mm |
|
Boot space |
471 litres |
330 litres |
380 litres (Turbo) 350 litres (Hybrid) |
In terms of dimensions, all three SUVs are almost similar in length, with the X50 having a slight edge. In case of width and height, the Chery Tiggo Cross takes the lead, promising more headroom, shoulder room and a sense of openness inside the cabin. The Traz closely follows the Chery SUV in terms of vertical space and has the longest wheelbase in the bunch.
As far as the luggage space is concerned, the Traz is the clear winner with a generous capacity of 471 litres (120-140 litres bigger than rivals), enabling owners to carry all essentials for family trips or shopping hauls.
Engine and Performance
All three SUVs are powered by a 1.5-litre engine, though the tuning differs significantly. The Perodua SUV uses a naturally-aspirated mill that delivers modest output numbers, smooth driving and strong fuel efficiency, targeting budget-conscious buyers and daily commuters.
The X50, powered by a turbo engine, has a more performance-oriented approach. It delivers the highest power and torque figures and a more engaging driving experience; however, the fuel economy is less compared to rivals.
The Chery Tiggo Cross comes in two engine options - turbo petrol and hybrid. The former balances performance and efficiency, while the latter promises a smooth hybrid drive with an impressive fuel consumption, well-suited for buyers looking for electrified tech without fully committing to a pure EV.
Overall, the Perodua Traz emphasises efficiency and ease of ownership, the Proton X50 prioritises driving dynamics and performance, and the Chery Tiggo Cross stands out with its hybrid powertrain engineered for maximum efficiency and seamless driving.
Here’s a detailed comparison of engine specifications -
|
Specs |
Perodua Traz |
Proton X50 |
Chery Tiggo Cross |
|
Engine |
1.5-litre naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine |
1.5-litre turbocharged 4-cylinder petrol engine |
1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine/1.5-litre naturally aspirated engine + two electric motors |
|
Max power |
106 PS |
181 PS |
147 PS/96 PS engine + 204 PS e-motor |
|
Max torque |
138 Nm |
290 Nm |
210 Nm/120 Nm engine + 210 Nm e-motor |
|
Transmission |
D-CVT |
7-speed wet DCT |
6-speed dual-clutch transmission/Direct Hybrid Transmission |
|
Drive system |
Front-wheel drive |
Front-wheel drive |
Front wheel drive |
|
Drives modes |
Eco, Normal and Sport |
Normal, Sport, Eco, and Adaptive Mode |
Eco / Normal / Sport |
|
Fuel efficiency |
21.3 kmpl |
15.4–15.6 kmpl (estimated) |
15.87 kmpl (Turbo) 18.52 kmpl (Hybrid) |
Design
The design remains a subjective thing when comparing the cars, as what appeals to you may not look impressive to others.
Photo by Adam AubreyWith that said, the Perodua Traz has a clean, youthful and functional design with smooth surfaces, a wide grille, and minimal overhangs. Without being overly aggressive, it leaned toward practicality and emphasis on utility and ergonomics.
Photo by Adam AubreyThe Proton X50, on the other hand, looks sportier and premium than the other two, featuring a bold grille, sleek silhouette, and aggressive stance. The cabin has a more upscale approach with a tech-forward feel.
Photo by Adam AubreyThe Chery Tiggo Cross boasts a bold and contemporary design with a futuristic grille, matrix-styled LED lighting, sharp lines, sculpted surfaces and robust proportions. The interior reflects modern trends with a driver-focused cockpit and sleek surfaces.
Features
Here’s a quick feature-wise comparison of the three SUVs (taking their top variants into account) -

|
Model |
Perodua Traz H |
Proton X50 Flagship |
Chery Tiggo Cross Hybrid CSH |
|
Headlights |
Full LED with follow-me-home and leaving home function |
Automatic LED with follow me home function |
Automatic LED with follow me home function |
|
DRLs |
LED |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Lights |
LED |
LED |
LED |
|
Fog lamps |
LED front |
No |
Rear |
|
Wheels |
17-inch |
18-inch |
17-inch |
|
Side mirrors |
Auto-retractable with integrated LED and welcome lamp |
Electric with auto fold |
Standard |
|
Tailgate |
Hands-free power with kick sensor |
Hands-free power |
Remote control opening |
|
Panoramic sunroof |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Infotainment |
9.0-inch |
14.6-inch |
10.25-inch |
|
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Speaker |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
Instrument cluster |
4.2-inch TFT analogue |
8.88-inch |
10.25-inch |
|
Air conditioning |
Single-zone auto |
Single-zone auto with N95 cabin filter |
Dual-zone auto |
|
Auto-dimming rearview mirror |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
Wireless charger |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Electronic parking brake |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Upholstery |
Fabric |
Leatherette |
Faux Leather |
|
Power-adjustable seats |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Ambient lighting |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Keyless entry and push-start button |
Yes |
Yes with remote engine start |
Yes with remote engine start |
|
Airbags |
6 |
6 |
7 |
|
Cruise control |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
ADAS pack |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Auto park assist |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Digital video recorder |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Tyre pressure monitoring system |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Camera |
360° surround view |
360° HD with 180° transparent view |
360° HD Panoramic |
The table reveals that all three SUVs are well-loaded with features, promising a comfortable driving experience. However, a closer comparison reveals their distinctive approaches. While the Traz is equipped with smart, practical bits, the X50 gives a more aspirational and luxurious vibe, and the Tiggo Cross provides a well-rounded package for everyday comfort.
Who wins the compact SUV faceoff - Traz, X50 or Tiggo Cross?
Well, all three SUVs are strong contenders in Malaysia’s compact SUV market, each bringing its own strengths to the table. When it comes to choosing one out of them, the answer boils down to what you prefer.
- The Perodua Traz provides the best overall value; it offers good practicality and smart features without paying a premium.
- The Proton X50 is a balanced and premium option that offers strong performance and an aspirational equipment pack at a higher price tag.
- The Chery Tiggo Cross is a well-rounded choice that prioritises comfort, safety and hybrid efficiency.
Perodua Traz vs Proton X50 Comparison
Perodua Traz Related Stories
- News
- Featured Stories
Perodua Car Models
Don't Miss
Malaysia Autoshow
Trending & Fresh Updates
- Latest
- Popular
You might also be interested in
- News
- Featured Stories
Perodua Featured Cars
- Latest
- Upcoming
- Popular
Compare & Recommended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground Clearance
210 mm
|
220 mm
|
200 mm
|
-
|
158 mm
|
|
Seating Capacity
5
|
7
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
Fuel Type
Petrol
|
Petrol
|
Petrol
|
Petrol
|
Electric
|
|
Engine
1496
|
1496
|
998
|
1499
|
-
|
|
Power
105
|
101
|
98
|
179
|
201
|
|
Torque
138 Nm
|
133 Nm
|
140 Nm
|
290 Nm
|
285 Nm
|
|
Transmission Type
CVT
|
Automatic
|
CVT
|
Dual Clutch
|
Automatic
|
|
|
Trending SUV
- Latest
- Upcoming
- Popular
Compare
You can add 3 variants maximum*- Brand
- Model
- Variant